Now that we know the Biogenesis scandal has real legs, a few ideas come to mind. First, kudos to the Miami New Times for breaking the story. The fact that this alternative newspaper got the scoop instead of either MLB or a major news organization leads to this question, “Was anyone trying to trace where players obtained their drugs?” Ryan Braun, Melky Cabrera, Bartolo Colon and Yasmani Grandal all tested positive in the last two years, and all were connected to this supplier. Did anyone find the connection before the New Times article?
Second, these anti-aging clinics can’t be that rare. Where else are players finding drugs. Is MLB investigating other places that might be doing the same thing? I find it tough to believe that Biogenesis was the only supplier out there.
Third, whatever protocol the players used to get around positive tests didn’t work all that well. While a number of players who were on the list have not been caught, a few did fail tests. Are there new formulations of drugs that don’t appear on a test? If so, I hope new tests are being developed. (This is how Ben Johnson was caught. He thought he had a drug unknown to the IOC. Instead, it had been recently discovered, and the Olympics had a new test.) It is important to figure out how these athletes were passing testing negative so protocols or chemistry can get better.
Finally, is it time for MLB to get out of the policing business? As Melky Cabrera and Bartolo Colon showed last year, teams are not hurt by drug use. The Giants and Athletics were helped by those two improving their performances by using drugs. There is no incentive for front offices or field managers to turn in their own players. Fans aren’t hurt that much, except for those who hold records dear. The people most hurt are other players, who lose the level playing field as they compete for salary. Maybe it’s time to throw all of this on the MLBPA. Their membership know what incentive and disincentives might work to prevent further use. No matter how much the MLBPA cooperates with MLB, there is still going to be an adversarial relationship between the two entities, with the MLBPA often taking the side of a player they really should be prosecuting. For example, a union penalty might be, “We will no longer recognized the guaranteed status of your contract.”
Imagine if that was the penalty for Ryan Braun. He would be losing $100 million instead of three or four million. Not that it’s tough for this penalty to come from MLB, because there would be the suspicion of tampering to get rid of a bad contract. Under union testing, however, there would be a higher level of trust that the player really was using.
I welcome your thoughts in the comments.