The New York Daily News, one of the biggest critics of Alex Rodriguez, falls over themselves to praise PED user Jason Giambi in his retirement:
Giambi is one of only 14 players since 1901 to have at least 400 homers, 1,400 RBI, 400 doubles and an on-base percentage of .399 or higher.
He also endured his share of tough times, most notably his involvement in the BALCO performance-enhancing drug scandal more than a decade ago. Unlike many players involved in PED scandals, Giambi emerged on the other side with his reputation restored, even becoming a finalist for Colorado’s managerial job in 2012.
“Some of us have to walk through the darkness to find the light,” Giambi said. “I did that. The human being you see today is the result of everything that I went through. It turned me, hopefully, into this mentor that helped the kids in Colorado and Cleveland, and hopefully the most incredible father for my kids.”
So his stats are okay to compare to other ballplayers? Why? I suspect that Giambi was good to the reporters covering him, with quotes and attitude. In C, I’d write the line of code as:
coverage = GoodGuy ? PassOnPEDs : RipForPEDS;
Like most players, retirement was not Giambi’s choice. When no one will sign you, it’s time to go on. The ability to mentor does not trump the inability to hit a pitch.

