January 28, 2009

Questioning Radomski

Bob Sikes worked for the Mets when Dwight Gooden took his drug tests and doubts Kirk Radomski’s story on the subject:

Gooden returned to the Mets in June after serving a suspension. As part of his return, he was required to take mandatory tests administered by the commissioner. Tests were adminsitered both on the road and at home. A witness for the ballclub was required along with the commissioner’s adminsitrator. From the years 1987 through the end of the 1991 season that person was either me or my boss, Head Trainer Steve Garland. We signed a document after Gooden supplied the sample in our presence. No person would have been able to swith a sample afterwards as they were sealed in our presence and we signed the sealed packaging afterwards.
I was let go after the 1991 season and Gooden’s time with the Mets ended after the 1994 season – Garland’s last. Sam McCrary served as assistant – a man I know well. Although I was not there, I’m comfortable in saying that Garland – or Gooden for that matter would have allowed anyone besides Garland or McCrary to witness Gooden’s drug test for the ballclub. That person would never have been a man who served as a clubhouse attendant as Kirk Radomski is quoted as saying in an interview with ESPN.

1 thought on “Questioning Radomski

  1. Bob Tufts

    Has his attorney advised him to keep quiet?
    Also, how are th eleagl bills for Radomski and McNamee being paid – they really don’t meet the typical definition of pro bono work?

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *