Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
November 13, 2008
AL Cy Young Preview

The BBWAA bestows the American League Cy Young award this afternoon. The smart money rests on Cliff Lee, who both won the most games in the American League and posted the lowest ERA. His main competition for the award comes from 20-game winner Roy Halladay.

Lee came out of the gate strong, winning his first six starts and throwing nine shutout innings in his seventh, only to see Cleveland lose the game in extra innings. He went through two rough patches, on at the end of May and one at the end of September. Overall, however, he allowed two runs or less in 21 of his 31 starts, and two earned runs or less in 22 of those starts.

Lee's strengths lay in his control and home runs allowed. He walked just 34 men on the season, a little over one per start and 1.4 per nine innings. He gave up just 12 home runs, or 10.7 per 200 innings pitched. He did allow a higher batting average with runners in scoring position compared to his overall BA allowed, but he only saw 165 at bats out of 847 total with men in scoring position. He just didn't allow men past first base very often.

The best case for Roy Halladay comes from the competition he faced. Lee, playing in the AL Central, faced Kansas City five times and the Twins four times. He went a combined 7-1 against those teams with a 2.69 ERA. Halladay, competing in the AL East, faced the Rays, Red Sox and Yankees a total of 16 times, nearly half his starts. In those 16 games, Halladay posted a 10-6 record with a 2.96 ERA in 118 2/3 innings. That's an average of 7 1/3 innings per start against three good teams.

Halladay posted the same walks per nine as Lee, struck out batters at a higher rate, but also gave up a few more home runs. Like Lee, Halladay gave the opposition very few chances with runners in scoring position, and allowed just a .214 BA in the situation.

This is a tough one for me to pick. Lee leads in ERA, and when he was on was absolutely brilliant. Halladay faced much tougher competition during the season and responded to the challenge. Both deserve the award. Lee will probably win, but Halladay's tougher competition would likely push my first place vote to Roy.


Posted by David Pinto at 08:37 AM | Awards | TrackBack (0)
Comments

I totally understand the stiffer competition argument (which, by the way, is one that could have been used in Santana's favor), but Lee actually outpitched Slightly) Halladay in games against common tough opponents - ie. Rays, Yanks, Tigers, Rangers. Lee got shallacked against the Rangers in one start, but other than that, he was very good when the caliber of offensive competition was strong. He just had fewer of those starts that Halladay. Hallday was also very good in those games, by the way, as David mentioned, so that's not a knock on him at all.

I'm not sure it's fair to use strength of schedule as an argument when the pitchers aren't quite close in all the other stats. I could understand if it's a tiebreaker kind of situation, but Lee really was much better overall.

Posted by: crankycon at November 13, 2008 09:35 AM

'Quality of batters faced"

Lee: .262/.330/.405
Halladay: .266/.342/.425

Lee's was the second easiest in the AL among pitchers with 90+ innings... Halladay's was third toughest in the MAJORS, min 90 innings.

Using basic runs created, an average pitcher would have allowed about 139 runs in Halladay's 246 innings, to 118 in Lee's 223.3 innings. That is a 5.09 runs allowed per 9 innings for Halladay vs 4.76 for Lee.

Posted by: Eric at November 13, 2008 10:15 AM

Should career achievement count in Cy Young voting? Halladay has been an excellent pitcher for much longer than Lee, who's had an up and down (literally and figuratively) career.

Bartolo Colon for Grady Sizemore, Cliff Lee and Brandon Phillips has to be the best last-year-of-a-contract deal ever. Too bad the Indians didn't understand what they had in Phillips.

Posted by: JJ at November 13, 2008 01:03 PM

Should career achievement count in Cy Young voting?

No

I don't really buy the competition factor on this one - Lee put together as solid a season as could be - consistent from the beginning to end - at no point in the season was his ERA over 2.58.

If Lee hadn't had as good a year as he had I might buy it but not this year.

Posted by: Bandit at November 13, 2008 01:51 PM

A great pitcher to be in this select group.

Posted by: 649 winning numbers at November 13, 2008 05:11 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?