Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
September 01, 2005
Ponson Put Out to Pasture

The Orioles released Sidney Ponson today.

Ponson, on the 15-day disabled list with thumb and calf injuries, has one season left on a three-year deal that would pay him $10 million in 2006.

"The Orioles did what we felt was justified and right, and indeed what we were compelled to do," said H. Russell Smouse, the team's general counsel. "There was really no alternative after a deliberate consideration of all the facts."

Ponson's agent, Barry Praver, also did not return a call. Praver and Ponson have not talked to the media since the 28-year-old pitcher's arrest last week.

"We will clearly grieve it," said Michael Weiner, the general counsel of the players' association.

The Orioles invoked the morals clause:

Every player on the 40-man roster signs a standard contract that includes a morals clause, paragraph 3(a), that reads: "The Player agrees to perform his services hereunder diligently and faithfully, to keep himself in first-class physical condition and to obey the Club's training rules, and pledges himself to the American public and to the Club to conform to high standards of personal conduct, fair play and good sportsmanship."

The Orioles believe Ponson violated that rule.

"It relates to his alcohol-related conduct over a period of time," Smouse said.

The Rockies ended up paying Denny Neagle most of his remaining contract when they tried something similar. I suspect the Orioles will find themselves in the same position.

But good for the Orioles for trying. They certainly gave Ponson a chance to clean up his act. I suppose if he were pitching like an ace and the team was in the middle of a pennant race, things might be different. Sir Sidney strikes me as someone who's wasted a lot of talent and the good will of his organization.


Posted by David Pinto at 06:40 PM | Baseball Jerks | TrackBack (0)
Comments

The end result maybe that the O's have to pay him. If that turns out to be the case then it's a black eye for baseball and means that paragraph 3(a) isn't worth the ink it's printed with. Any of his issues this year may not rise to level of deserving to have his contract voided but 3 strikes and he should. Hopefully the arbiter will decide that paragraph 3(a) does have some validity.

Posted by: John Gibson at September 1, 2005 10:33 PM

Maybe he hasn't gotten his problem with alcohol under control. That should be his first concern; getting released might wake him up to that.

Posted by: rbj at September 2, 2005 08:59 AM

So, is he a Yankee yet?

Posted by: Steve Brady at September 2, 2005 02:31 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?