Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
December 02, 2004
Giambi On Steroids

Sorry I'm late with this. My dad had eye surgery this morning. He's doing fine.

Eric McErlain has a linked filled post on the revelations of the Giambi brothers steroid use. The SF Chronicle article is here.

I must say I'm very disappointed, both at Giambi's stupidity and his dishonesty. First the stupidity:


Nedrow also asked Giambi about several different-colored pills Anderson provided; they were denoted on calendars as "Y" for yellow, "W" for white and "O" for orange, according to the ballplayer. Giambi testified that he didn't know what the pills were, though he thought the white one might have been Clomid, a female fertility drug that can enhance the effectiveness of testosterone. His use of the drug was reflected on a calendar, the prosecutor said.

"I don't know what they were," Giambi testified. "He didn't really explain them. He just had told me to take them. And it had -- he explained it has something to do with the system. ... He just said to take it in conjunction with all the stuff."


It's too bad Anderson's not a doctor; then Giambi could sue him for malpractice. Next, the dishonesty.

Giambi, a five-time All-Star, played his first seven seasons in Oakland, emerging as one of the game's top stars. After the 2001 season, the 6-foot-3-inch, 235-pound slugger signed a seven-year, $120 million contract with the Yankees. Two months after testifying before the grand jury, Giambi reported to spring training this year looking considerably thinner, though he insisted he had lost just four pounds.

There was speculation that the weight loss stemmed from Giambi's stopping the use of steroids. Asked by reporters during spring training whether he ever used performance-enhancing drugs, Giambi said, "Are you talking about steroids? No."


Don't these people know how not to answer a question? How about no comment or I'm not going to talk about that? The coverup is always worse than the crime.

What should happen next? Giambi was taking the steroids during 2003, the year the steroid ban went into effect in baseball.


Anderson kept him supplied with drugs through the All-Star break in July 2003, Giambi said. He said he had received a second and final batch of testosterone in July but opted not to use it because he had a knee injury and "didn't want to do any more damage."

Can the commissioner's office take action? A judge Landis like Black Sox ban? Probably not, since the procedures for dealing with cheaters are built into the basic agreement. But things have changed. The basic agreement was designed to protect the privacy of the players. The results were to be secret, and would only come to light if the ballplayers continued abuse and were suspended. It seems a ban is out of the question.

Can the Yankees do anything? It will be interesting to see if they can nullify the contract based on Giambi's 2003 usage. What will be more interesting is if Giambi can no longer play, will the insurance pay off on the contract? I wonder if they wrote the policy to exclude problems from illegal drugs?

Can some good come out of this. I hope players read this testimony and think, "I don't want to be that much of an idiot." My guess is that the lure of big bucks from big muscles will keep athletes shooting up.

Which brings me back to a point I've made before; let athletes take these under a doctor's care. Do you think a physician would have given a player female fertility pills? We're not going to stop steroid use by banning it. But maybe we can control the bad side effects controling the use.

It will be interesting to see Conte's interview. I expect this will get a lot worse.

One final thought. I'm disappointed as well that the transcript of the grand jury was leaked.


Anderson has denied wrongdoing in the BALCO case. His attorney, J. Tony Serra, declined comment, citing a court order aimed at preserving the secrecy of grand jury proceedings.

So in the future, players are going to be less willing to testify about people like Anderson. They'll go to court and take the fifth amendment, and the Greg Andersons of this world will keep on pushing their drugs. I'm sure the Chronicle is happy they got a big scoop, but I doubt there will be any cooperation with grand juries in the future.

Update: Jeff Quinton is keeping track of other bloggers commenting the subject.

Update: James Joyner has more.


Posted by David Pinto at 12:30 PM | Cheating | TrackBack (5)
Comments

What I think is interesting is that Giambi's admitted use of steroids outside of BALCO. Everyone only focuses on BALCO in the race to see who can bring down Bonds, while the vast majority of users in baseball got their steroids from other sources. I guess it must be harder to do real investigative reporting and track down other distributors than somehow get copies of someones supposedly confidential testimony.

Posted by: Man of Leisure at December 2, 2004 02:57 PM

Mmmmmhhh. I don't know if players are going to just shut up and plead the fifth. Giambi was granted immunity from prosecution if he testified, so he did. I am sure more players would be willing to participate that way. Maybe it depends on what Giambi's punishment finally is.

Posted by: Jose from Spain at December 2, 2004 03:22 PM

several things

first, it really upsets me that not enough people are upset that supposedly secret grand jury testimony was leaked. even if giambi was given immunity from criminal prosecution, that has nothing to do with what MLB and or the yankees can do to him.

second, we don't even know if this supposed secret transcript is even real.

third and last,
about anderson not being a doctor - when i was 6 months pregnant, i went into a health food store and asked the clerk about bying andro, to increase my muscle strength, and he said, yeah it's good stuff, and would have sold it to me on the spot.

also, you can buy real growth hormone right on the internet from a "doctor" - i got a spam email and checked it out and for like 150 bucks, i could have gotten some. as long as i said i was like 64 instead of 24.....

Posted by: lisa gray at December 2, 2004 06:34 PM

Lisa, I've been outraged all day over the leak. I deal with the DOJ on a daily basis. They are the world's most powerful criminal organization, and there is hardly any DOJ case that does not involve criminal behavior by Justice Department lawyers. More people aren't outraged, I suspect, because they're looking at this through the filter of their own views on steroid use. But that shouldn't be the primary concern. The BALCO story is first and foremost about the abuse of government power.

Posted by: Skip Oliva at December 3, 2004 02:07 AM

Skip-- I'm certainly cynical enough to believe that DOJ did it, but don't have enough context to guess at the liklihood-- does your daily experience tell you? How certain is it that the leak came from DOJ's primaries? Are there clerical staff with access? Do folks get copies of their own testimony? Could McCain get a copy? Could people record their testimony serreptitiously? Certainly there are several people/entities whose purposes are advanced by the leak-- should we assume that only the prosecutors had the opportunity? Could the prosecutors have provided Selig or Steinbrenner with copies subrosa, not anticipating that they might abuse the favor? (I'm not being sarcastic, I'm hoping you know what I do not.)

After Ken Starr and Jose Padilla its hard to find the adrenaline for outrage-- it just seems like the way things are. I wonder sometimes if we aren't headed for history's first revolution in which the new constitution is the same as the old one...

Posted by: john swinney at December 6, 2004 10:41 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?