February 09, 2009
More Testing
The Daily News reports that those negative 2003 urine samples still exist and might be retested to see if anything undetectable then is found now. So just because someone came up negative in 2003 doesn't mean he's out of the woods.
Posted by David Pinto at
01:02 PM
|
Cheating
|
TrackBack (0)
Doesn't MLB throw out anything?
That would be very interesting. I say go for it.
Presumably only the government will do any additional testing. For MLB to do so would require a collectively bargained consent...and that's not going to happen under any circumstances. Why would the government do testing outside any pending criminal case?