Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
April 18, 2008
The Color Line

Adrian Burgos, Jr. is an Associate Professor of US History at the University of Illinois and author of Playing America's Game: Baseball, Latinos, and the Color Line (American Crossroads). As we celebrate Jackie Robinson this week, he sends along this thoughtful piece on how Latinos relate to baseball's integration story. Enjoy.

On April 15, Major League Baseball (MLB) again celebrated its integration pioneer Jackie Robinson by allowing players to wear his retired jersey number in honor of his legacy. All the black players donning 42 spurred lamentations in the media about the decline numbers of African Americans in baseball.

As African American numbers have declined, Latino numbers have skyrocketed, with many darker-skinned players from Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Cuba and Venezuela owing thanks to Jackie's door-opening achievement. Little is said about why darker-skinned Latinos aren't so inclined to don 42, because so little is understood about how they relate to baseball's integration story.

The truth is, a major piece of the Robinson legacy is missing and MLB is blowing an opportunity to educate the American public about integration's full scope.

Latinos were drastically affected by segregation. While a select number of Latinos (just over 50) performed in the Majors before Robinson, over 230 played in the Negro Leagues, just as Robinson did before organized baseball's color line was dismantled.

The process wherein the overwhelming majority of Latinos were designated racially unacceptable for organized baseball remains one of baseball's lesser known stories. As I argue in my book Playing America's Game: Baseball, Latinos, and the Color Line (University of California Press, 2007), Major League team officials masterfully manipulated racial understandings throughout the time its color line stood in place to broker access for a few Latinos. Over time the Latinos officials ushered into organized baseball became increasingly racially ambiguous. "He's not black," they explained, "He's Cuban." Thus the Washington Senators, Cincinnati Reds, New York Giants, and a handful of other organizations plucked players from the Spanish-speaking Americas. They so successfully muddled racial perception that it necessitated an unambiguously black player to destroy any semblance of ambiguity, enter Jackie Robinson.

It is extremely troubling that this history continues to be conveniently elided in the Robinson commemorations and the more recently instituted Civil Rights Game. For this year's game MLB convened a panel of seven African Americans and Mets GM Omar Minaya as the lone Latino to discuss baseball, race, and civil rights. The lineup of luminaries gathered reveals that MLB does not acknowledge Latino participation in the struggle to overturn segregation or their stake in the past, present, and future of baseball.

That this continues to occur at the moment when Latinos are nearing forty percent of Major Leaguers is shameful and contributes to the popular perception of Latinos as a people without a (long) history in America's game--although the first Latino played in the National League in 1882.

The way MLB (mis-)remembers Jackie and baseball integration also diminishes the legacy of the Negro Leagues and of the integrated Latin American leagues.

On the other side of organized baseball's racial divide African Americans and Latinos collaborated in the establishment of a circuit that for decades refined the ball-playing skills of the excluded. In Havana, Santo Domingo, San Juan, Mexico City, and Caracas, among other Latin American cities, African American players like Rube Foster, John Henry "Pop" Lloyd, and Willie Wells were welcomed in racially integrated leagues. Drawing on his own experience, Foster's vision for the Negro Leagues from his various failed start-ups until he successfully launched the Negro National League in 1920 always included Latinos.

Jackie Robinson was a product of the circuit they built. And let's not forget that it was in this circuit the multitalented athlete honed his skills in what was arguably his fourth best sport. And it was here where Branch Rickey and his men first scouted pioneering black players Robinson, Monte Irvin, Roy Campanella, and Orestes "Minnie" Miñoso, among others.

For all the recent talk about engaging in a national conversation on race, we are constantly revisiting a narrative of race relations of black-white, whether inside or outside of baseball. That circumscribed narrative about race fails us all.

2009 will mark the 60th anniversary of Minnie Miñoso's debut as the first black Latino to perform in the Majors. His pioneering achievement in overcoming a doubly complex set of racial and cultural challenges as a black Latino to develop into a major league star ought to be the centerpiece of a year-long series of events that portrays baseball's integration saga in its full multicultural splendor. Only then will we truly remember the full impact of Jackie's achievement and honor the entire roster of those who contributed to the overthrow of baseball's Jim Crow system.

Update: Fixed the paragraph breaks.


Posted by David Pinto at 02:55 PM | History | TrackBack (0)
Comments

to Adrian Burgos Jr.

! Bien Hecho ! Muy Buen Hecho !

Well Done!

Posted by: Leco at April 18, 2008 06:26 PM

Adrian,

Your perspectives draw on the narrowly defined racial discourse that surrounds baseball, and the U.S. generally. What's interestign is how Latino -- a racial signfier -- baseballplayers are constructed within a nationalist, and thus, a foreign discourse, consequently excluding them from challenging U.S. racial institutions, including baseball.

Well said mi hermano and fellow scholar. Why doesn't ESPN or another prominent sports outlet include you in the discussion around Robinson, race, and integration?

And I should say, parallels can be found regarding Jazz, Hip-Hop, and other cultural expressions.

Wilson Valentin-Escobar
Assistant Professor, Hampshire College

Posted by: Wilson Valentin at April 19, 2008 08:40 PM

Adrian,

Your perspectives draw on the narrowly defined racial discourse that surrounds baseball, and the U.S. generally. What's interestign is how Latino -- a racial signfier -- baseballplayers are constructed within a nationalist, and thus, a foreign discourse, consequently excluding them from challenging U.S. racial institutions, including baseball.

Well said mi hermano and fellow scholar. Why doesn't ESPN or another prominent sports outlet include you in the discussion around Robinson, race, and integration?

And I should say, parallels can be found regarding Jazz, Hip-Hop, and other cultural expressions.

Wilson Valentin-Escobar
Assistant Professor, Hampshire College

Posted by: Wilson Valentin at April 19, 2008 08:40 PM

Dear Adrian,
Thanks to you for bringing your research and commentary into the American baseball history discourse....I have found in my research on my father, pitcher Johnny Schoolboy Taylor of the NY Cubans, a wonderful synergy among the black and Latino players...Taylor was led to the opportunity-filled leagues in Mexico and Cuba through legendary greats Salazar and Dihigo, Tiant. Gibson, Brown and Dandridge....the racial and cultural coupling and un -coupling occurred as the economic realities set in for the MLB teams .....greatness could never be denied!
All the best,
MTH

Posted by: Maureen Taylor Hicks at April 20, 2008 03:52 PM

I wrote a very similar paper when I was in college. I found extremely hipocritical to act as though baseball was entirely white until Jackie Robinson. I was focusing on race as the floating signifier - what is the difference between whites, blacks, light skinned latinos, and darker latinos? According to MLB, a lot.

Posted by: Jeffrey Tucker at April 21, 2008 04:07 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?