Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
October 18, 2007
Manny Robbed, Screws Up

After the Red Sox hit into their ninth double play of the series, Ortiz walks and Ramirez hits what appears to be a home run off the top of the wall in right center. Manny doesn't run, thinking the ball is gone, but it's so close the ball bounces back on the field and the umpires call it in play. Ortiz scores from first, but the lolly-gagging Ramirez ends up at first with a single. Manny watched the ball rather than run it out. Of course, it's not the end of the world if the Red Sox lose.

Lowell strikes out, so it doesn't make a lot of difference.

Update: According to the broadcast, if the ball hits the yellow line, it's not a home run. The yellow line is part of the wall, separate from the shelf behind. It sure is tough to tell from the replay, but the ump probably made a good call. All the more reason to be upset at Manny for not hustling.

Maybe someday they'll remake Airplane with Manny taking on the Abdul-Jabbar role. :-)


Posted by David Pinto at 09:21 PM | League Championship Series | TrackBack (0)
Comments

That wasn't his home run trot. He hit a fly ball to right that should have been caught. The wind pushed it out, and Manny was surprised by it...

Posted by: Lyford at October 18, 2007 09:31 PM

Not to defend Manny, but if that ball was hit into the gap, he's on second or third by the end. He only lollygags when the ball is hit directly over the head of a fielder... either it's gone (I've only seen him wrong once) or it gets caught. He should hustle in case of an error, but still - we're talking about a very very small incremental harm to his team.

The rules as stated online say it should be a home run if the ball hits "over the yellow line". I'm assuming this means hits the yellow line OR ABOVE. If that's the case, there is absolutely no excuse for the umps to blow this call. A ball cannot be going downward and strike a vertical wall and bounce UP. It's physically impossible. The fact that the ball bounced upwards is pretty clear evidence that it was a home run. This happened to JD Drew earlier in the year - a ball hit off the top of the monster, the flat part that's kind of like a countertop for the front row seats. It bounced up and back onto the field. Had it hit the vertical wall, it would have bounced DOWN.

So umpires not understanding physics cost the Sox a run in the postseason, and 10% of JD Drew's home runs this year. Embarassing.

Posted by: Mike at October 18, 2007 09:33 PM

Is the salient question top of the wall vs. beyond the wall? What exactly is the ruling supposed to be on a ball that hits the top of the wall? If that ball hit the top and then went out, that would be a home run, right? Or not? I was under the impression that if it hit the top of the fence, it would be a home run regardless of which direction it goes, but Buck is saying that (a) the ball hit the top of the wall, and (b) that they made the right call.

Either way, it gave Manny another opportunity to look like an ass.

Posted by: Adam Villani at October 18, 2007 09:35 PM

That's what I thought, Mike, in which case I agree with you -- I can't see how they could think it didn't at least go off of the top of the wall. If it were a matter of whether it hit the top vs. whether it went out, that'd be a difficult question. If the rules say the top of the wall is out, then I don't know how they blew that call.

Posted by: Adam Villani at October 18, 2007 09:40 PM

All right, I took a look at the ground rules online:
"Fair batted ball that travels over the yellow line on top of the outfield wall (on the fly): HOME RUN."

Does "over" mean "completely clears" or "over the line separating the yellow from the green part"? The wording is kind of ambiguous, but if it's consistently interpreted in the former way, then they made the right call.

Posted by: Adam Villani at October 18, 2007 09:45 PM

I don't think it's ambiguous. The line, just like a line in tennis or volleyball, is several inches wide; it's not a geometric line with no width. To go "over" it means to clear the yellow completely.

Posted by: Tor at October 18, 2007 10:00 PM

It makes no sense to paint a line on a wall such that it is several inches wide on both the vertical part of the wall, and the horizontal top. Having the line exist on the top of the wall just allows for weird stuff like this. What if the ball hit the exact same spot on the top of the wall and then bounced into the stands instead of back onto the field? That would, according to Tor's interpretation, be ruled a double!

What about those vertical lines that determine home runs on angled walls? If the ball hits that line, is it a home run or is it in play? It was always my assumption that if it hit these lines, it was considered a home run. I had thought it was the same for the horizontal lines.

Posted by: Mike at October 18, 2007 10:37 PM

Leave it to Fox commentators to ride Manny. What a bunch of ass-wipes, just like their bias and rascist talking heads that parade at prime time trying to pander their non-stop propaganda.

They should add Potty Mouth Coulter to their baseball booth which I am sure would delight their knucklehead viewers.

Posted by: Tony at October 18, 2007 11:03 PM

"Ever seen the inside of a Turkish prison?"

Posted by: mraver at October 19, 2007 02:48 AM

I think it's incredibly condescending, you might say racist, to suggest that one can't criticise a black man when he doesn't hustle. Repeatedly.

Manny poses like a jerk, maybe costs his team in an elimination game; it's Fox's fault!

Oh, the state of public education in America. I want my tax dollars back.

Posted by: dd at October 19, 2007 08:10 AM

Pathetic T-bag Tony, You are a clown. Racist? Because he put in no effort? Interesting, are we to assume that folks like Manny are not supposed to try? Cultural? Disgusting, pandering line of thought, you sicken me as much as a klansman.

Posted by: Tony Sucks at October 19, 2007 09:06 AM

After the commercial Fox came up with a definitive replay that showed the ball hitting the yellow line on top of the wall and bouncing back in. So the umps got the call right. The ball did not clear the yellow line.

As for Manny, I thought Buck and McCarver were covering for him almost all the time. They repeatedly defended his "not the end of the world" comment and generally adopted the let-you-know-who-be-you-know-who attitude.

The one exception was when Manny loafed so obviously that not even Buck and McCarver could ignore it or cover for it. What are they supposed to say? Manny really hustled on that play?

Posted by: casey Abell at October 19, 2007 09:18 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?