Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
May 16, 2006
715

Dan Lewis posts on Babe Ruth's 715th home run. The rules at the time only credited a batter who hit a walk-off home run with the number of bases needed to win the game. Ruth was credited with a triple on one of those.

I guess that's balanced by the rule at the time that credited balls that bounced into the stands as home runs. They're the ground rule doubles of today. I know Ruth didn't hit any of those in 1927, but I'm not sure about the rest of his career.


Posted by David Pinto at 04:13 PM | All-Time Greats | TrackBack (0)
Comments

I've updated the article to address David's concern. None of Ruth's 714 homers were of the ground rule double variety.

Posted by: DNL at May 16, 2006 04:30 PM

How does anybody know for sure that none of his HRs were of the ground rule double variety? There is not TV evidence of each and every one.

Posted by: steve at May 16, 2006 04:36 PM

so wait, Ruth only ever hit ONE walk-off HR with a man on?

Wow.

Posted by: Kevin at May 16, 2006 04:54 PM

That cat who says that Ruth really hit 1000 homers says that he hit a bunch via the ground rule route. He may have been purely speculating as well.

Posted by: Brett at May 16, 2006 04:55 PM

Anyone know how many inside-the-parkers he hit?

Posted by: Brett at May 16, 2006 04:59 PM

No walk-offs for Ruth? Next thing you know Sox fans will start saying he wasn't "clutch".

Posted by: Nate at May 16, 2006 05:09 PM

Gee, that's probably the worst attempt to insult Sawx fans...

Posted by: Michael at May 16, 2006 05:52 PM

No, no. The walk-off rule changed in 1920. So he only had one walk-off before 1920, which makes a lot of sense.

NB that he also hit the walk-off in question as a Red Sox player.

Posted by: DNL at May 16, 2006 06:07 PM

Easy there, Mike. It's called a joke. Must you take yourself so seriously?

Posted by: Nate at May 16, 2006 06:40 PM

From my understanding, the rule also used to be that if a ball went over the wall in fair territory and then curved foul it was foul, whereas now if it clears the inside of the foul pole, it's a homer. A guy did an article in Baseball Weekly a number of years ago about the possible additional homers Ruth would have had. I think it numbered in the dozen range, but I don't remember.

Posted by: Adrian at May 16, 2006 07:40 PM

Also, Ruth played mostly or all prior to the 162 game season. That might have added a couple a year. It was 154 games in 1927 when he he 60.

Posted by: Adrian at May 16, 2006 07:44 PM

Imagine how many fewer homers Ruth would have had if opposing pitchers had slow motion video replay technology.

Posted by: Britt at May 17, 2006 02:24 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?