Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
May 01, 2006
Santana to the Mets?

Bob Sikes at Getting Paid to Watch believes the Mets can make a deal for Johan Santana:

With tonight's start by Victor Zambrano ominous and tomorrow's John Maine debut not much more than that, one can assume Omar Minaya must note the same. This team is built and invested to win now, and I believe Minaya won't let his cellphone go unused.

Look first toward the struggling. The Minnesota Twins come first to mind. Terry Ryan and Joe McIlavaine know the Mets well and have been trading partners in the past. Johann Santana has struggled, but might be had. But Ryan and Joe Mac wont go for a care package of four of five.

Santana is in the second year of a four year contract that will pay him $25 million over the last two seasons (2007, 2008). That's a lot of money to spend on one player on a losing team. Of course, without Santana they're likely to lose more. But this is how small market teams survive; trade your value for potential value that's a lot cheaper.


Posted by David Pinto at 03:15 PM | Trades | TrackBack (0)
Comments

put. the. pipe. down.

Yes, of course, a rotation of Pedro, Santana, Glavine, Pelfrey, and Tracshel would be just dandy, but do the Mets even have what it takes to get that done? Mr. Sikes doesn't propose anything, but it would have to start with Milledge & Heilman.

Johann Santana ain't exactly bargain bin, and I can't help thinking that with Omar's history of paying top dollar... it would cut deep into the Mets rather thin major league depth.

Posted by: bmc at May 1, 2006 04:01 PM

Any such trade would almost have to include Milledge, Pelfrey, and Heilman (off the top of my head), but I don't see that happening, and even if it did it might not be enough.

Of course, the Twins should ask for David Wright, but that should be a non-starter. There aren't many properties in baseball more valuable than Santana, but Wright is one of them.

Posted by: Subrata Sircar at May 1, 2006 04:01 PM

It would take at least Milledge and Pelfrey - but the problem is Minaya can't trade Pelfrey for another month and a half or so because he was a 2005 draftee.

For a stud like Santana, they might have to part with Jose Reyes.

Posted by: Mike A. at May 1, 2006 04:05 PM

Pelfrey can't be traded until next Jan. The rule is that players can't be traded until one year after they sign. Pelfrey signed with the Mets on Jan. 10, 2006, so Jan 10, 2007 is the earliest he can be traded.

Posted by: Mark S. at May 1, 2006 04:11 PM

I'd certainly deal Milledge or Pelfrey in a heartbeat to get Santana, and maybe both (we're talking about a guy who's 27 and the best pitcher in baseball here), but why would the Twins be that crazy?

Posted by: Crank at May 1, 2006 04:27 PM

Why stop with Santana? Why not get Jake Peavy and Felix Hernandez while they're at it? Maybe Chris Carpenter?

Posted by: David Dean at May 1, 2006 04:48 PM

they're not! get real and stop dreaming. 10 mil per for johan is a steal when smucks like burnett, garland, loiaza, garcia get unbelievable contracts. they are going to lose radkes 10 mil plus hunter's 12, i think they can afford to keep the best pitcher in baseball for 12 and 13 mil. you guys are nuts.

Posted by: matt at May 1, 2006 04:50 PM

doesn't make a lot of sense, but it sure makes my outh water thinking about it...

Posted by: gentry at May 1, 2006 05:02 PM

Nice to get such comments. And thanks for the link, David. The Mets wont part with Pelfrewy and cannot as reader Mark S indicates. But it would take Milledge and perhaps Heilman. The rest could come from the minors. The Twins will need starters in return, so Brian Bannister would most likely be part of the return package. Victor Zambrano also can go. He pitches better under less stressful circumstances and may be betrer suited to the AL. Plus he's cheap. Closer of the future Henry Owens is the wild card. If Milledge, Owens , and Bannister are included, it won't take too much more.
If indeed the Mets have deemed Milledge untouchable, this is a non-starter. With Tori Hunter close to leaving, Minnesota will need an impact player who's cheaper like Milledge. Any deal for a front-line starter this season will have to include Milledge. So if he's untouchable forget about it and pray Mike Pelfrey has the goods and can be a number three over the seasons last fifty games.

Posted by: Bob Sikes at May 1, 2006 05:04 PM

It would take Milledge, Heilman, Wright, and a minor league arm PLUS a couple million to help pay for Wright next year after arbitration.

I agree with the first post:

PUT. DOWN. THE. PIPE.

NY is not the end all, be all for baseball. There are 28 other teams...

go pluck a pitcher or two off of KC or PIT.

Posted by: Kris at May 1, 2006 05:17 PM

and BTW why is anyone giving any credence to what the former assistant athletic trainer for the New York Mets speculates.

i have a news story for you. former twins batboy who currrently works construction, thinks the padres will trade jake peavy for kyle loshe and either boof bonsor or matt moses. he was there for the 1991 championship so he must know what he is talking about.

its good to know that all i need is a blog and a assistant trainers job to pass an unbelievable amount of crap off.

Posted by: matt at May 1, 2006 05:54 PM

Let me start by saying a deal of this sort is very unlikely. If it were to happen, it wouldn't be until mid-June at the earliest. The Twins have not given up in this season despite the disappointing start. Having said all that, let me address some of the stuff thrown out in these comments:
1. David Wright will NOT be included in any deal.
2. The way to get around the one year waiting period is to make a player a PTBNL.
3. Minaya would not go after Peavy or Carpenter. They don't even speak Spanish.
4. Two top prospects + cash may be enough since the acquiring team would also be taking on Santana's salary. Not that he is overpaid for his ability.

Posted by: LargeBill at May 1, 2006 06:13 PM

Pelfrey cannot be a PTBNL, since the transaction must be completed within 6 months. Unless the trade doesn't happen until after July 10th. Then Pelfrey cannot be the PTBNL.

Posted by: Mark S. at May 1, 2006 06:18 PM

There are some pretty nasty comments here considering that Mr. Sikes simply suggested that the Twins could provide a possible trading partner for the Mets. He's speculating and offering a potential solution. He didn't say this trade is going to happen or that he has some insider info. It was a suggestion. Some people here are a bit high strung.

Posted by: Benjamin Kabak at May 1, 2006 06:21 PM

re: Santana

you got to change
you got to change your evil ways.....

---Carlos Santana

like the great guitarist before him, Johan Santana is an artist of the first rank, albeit with the baseball and not with the guitar.

The Phillies need to start thinking about acquiring him if he's in the market, just to keep him away from the Braves and Mets.


Oh, and by the way, Vincente Padilla, traded for nothing to Texas, was blowing 96 mph smoke last nite against Cleveland. Is there some collective insanity governing the franchise in Philly when you would replace a fireballer like Padilla with candyarmed rookie junkballers like Ryan Madsen & Gavin Floyd who can't get their fastballs much past 90 mph???

Padilla by the way was the last player left over from the horrendous Schilling trade. If kept, he'd of outlasted Schilling by five-ten years. Now he'll be doing that like Schilling for another team.

--arthur john kyriazis
--philly

Posted by: arthur john kyriazis at May 1, 2006 06:22 PM

Matt: thanks for the kind words and jibe at my first profession. Please let us all know how many years you spent in professional baseball and how many at the major league level. And what experience have you had in dealing with scouts, managers and front office executives? And tell us all how many times you've actually sat in while trades were being talked about between clubs. As the name of my blog suggests, I spent a lot of time watching and listening to what was going on around me. At any rate, in any discussion I've ever had on any level under any circumstances did I find the need to disparage someone's chosen profession.

Posted by: Bob Sikes at May 1, 2006 06:53 PM

Did Santana forget to throw in a no-trade clause when he negotiated his below-market contract extension?

Posted by: Trev at May 2, 2006 02:51 AM

The Twins cannot be seriously thinking of trading Santana already can they? Wouldn't it be best to see how far they'll go into the season to find out how competitive they can be. The Mets have all the money in the world , but somehow come the play-offs I don't believe they'll have what it takes to beat either The Cards or The Astros.

Posted by: AJ at May 2, 2006 04:18 PM

Santana + Liriano in 2007 and beyond = atleast 1 World Series

Posted by: twins_4_ever at October 1, 2006 06:22 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?