Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
March 20, 2006
Crunch Time for Soriano

Alfonso Soriano refused to play the outfield tonight for Washington, and the Nationals are threatening to put him on the disqualified list:

The Nationals are off Tuesday, then travel to play the St. Louis Cardinals in Jupiter on Wednesday. If Soriano refuses to play in that game and again at home against the Baltimore Orioles on Thursday, the Nationals will take action.

"We told him if we get to Thursday, and he refuses to play left field, we told him at that point we will request that the commissioner's office place him on the disqualified list, at that time - no pay, no service time," Bowden said.

"If he refuses to play and goes home, and the commissioner's office accepts our request to place him on the disqualified list, then at that point, if he were to sit out this year, he would not be a free agent, he would stay our property because his service time would stay the same."

Will Soriano give up all that money? Or will Washington trade him? Stay tuned.

Baseball Musings is holding a pledge drive during March. Click here for details.


Posted by David Pinto at 09:16 PM | Baseball Jerks | TrackBack (0)
Comments

If Robinson thinks Soriano is a lead-off hitter, Soriano's doing the team a favor by not taking the field.

Posted by: Baseball Mike at March 20, 2006 09:45 PM

He does expand the strike zone doen't he?

Posted by: jim at March 20, 2006 10:16 PM

Likewise, if anybody thins Soriano's offense is acceptable for a leadoff hitter, they should be glad Soriano's not playing.
And I think Soriano (and his agent) know this. I believe they are playing this "I'm not playing left" game because they know that there is a huge difference, monetarily, between a second baseman who hits 260/15/70 with a 300 OBP and a left fielder with those same numbers. And Soriano will be a free agent after this season, of course. I wonder how Vidro feels?

Posted by: david at March 20, 2006 10:17 PM

Sorry, above where it says "leadoff hitter" substitute "left fielder". My brain got ahead of me...

Posted by: david at March 20, 2006 10:17 PM

...either way, it's a nightmare for a team that needs no distractions. It's gonna be hard enough for DC to win even if everything breaks right...and this contributes to the idea that the Nats don't know exactly what they're doing in their decision making process...the initial pursuit and acquisition of Soriano, in this case.

g

Posted by: glennrwordman at March 20, 2006 11:00 PM

soriano is making an ass of himself.

he hasn't hit worth spit out of arlington for 2 years and he can't catch a cold - who don't know that (except bowden)

and how dumb can you be to trade for a sulky **** like that who has said he will only play where he wants to play

talk about clubhouse cancer

Posted by: lisa gray at March 20, 2006 11:14 PM

When you make Jose Guillen sound like a calm, rational fellow, you know you're doing something seriously wrong. Soriano's behavior is childish, and I wish Jim Bowden was out of baseball for trading Wilkerson for this malcontent.

Posted by: Jeff B. at March 20, 2006 11:31 PM

The Nats really don't need to be in any hurry to trade Soriano, because (if they can get MLB to consider him ineligible) they won't have to pay for him.

This could get really interesting (or infuriating if you're a Nats fan!).

Posted by: matty fred at March 20, 2006 11:33 PM

How come Bowden didn't check with Soriano or his agent before the trade to see how he'd feel about a move to 2B?

Posted by: Niles at March 20, 2006 11:43 PM

Niles: Read about it in the Washington papers this week. Bowden is hardly innocent in this. He acquired Soriano KNOWING that the 2nd baseman was not going to switch to the outfield. It's a debacle. I'm going to write about this soon.

Posted by: Benjamin Kabak at March 20, 2006 11:46 PM

So, this is the Nationals trading away Wilkerson (a proven player) for somebody who they knew wouldn't go to the outfield, which isn't a negotionable option. And now they may decline to pay him or use him.

I don't know which party is more irritating, Bowden or Soriano. But I'm leaning towards Bowden.

Posted by: Hunter at March 21, 2006 12:21 AM

Everyone's to blame in the Soriano saga, according to me.

Posted by: Benjamin Kabak at March 21, 2006 01:01 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?