October 31, 2005
Dodgers Thoughts on Dodgers Tradition
Jon Weisman spells out quite nicely what traditions the Dodgers hold dear:
The record shows that DePodesta did not put the Dodgers in the playoffs again in 2005. Shocking, I know. Do you know what the Dodgers' record for consecutive postseason appearances is in their 121-year history? Two. It is a Dodger tradition, like it or not, to have disappointment and then regroup.
Smith, perhaps the Dodgers' highest-profile outside acquisition from the 1970s, missed 301 games in his six seasons with the team. Kirk Gibson, perhaps the Dodgers' highest-profile acquisition from the 1980s, played 71 games the season after his great home run - one fewer than J.D. Drew - and was soon unceremoniously dumped. It is a Dodger tradition, like it or not, for key players to get hurt and stay hurt.
The Dodgers traditionally win when they rely on their farm system and the farm system produces. To be sure, the farm system doesn't always produce. But in their entire history in Los Angeles, the team has made only one playoff appearance with fewer than five home-grown players in the starting lineup. That team was the hallowed 2004 team at whose breakup everyone is so aghast.
DePodesta bet his future on the Dodger Way, transforming the team into one that was going to rely on the farm system, supported by a few outside acquisitions. He had not finished the job - a 71-91 record indicates that - but he was doing exactly what people have been asking for since 1988. He was doing exactly what the Dodgers have been doing almost forever.
I've been reading the many comments left about the firing on this blog, trying to decide how I feel about DePodesta's departure. The main argument in favor of the firing is that Paul didn't build on last season's success; when he had a team to put together, it ended up with a poor record.
His defenders site that he didn't have enough time. He was building toward a sustainable model that would put the Dodgers in contention for a number of years.
I can't say there were many moves I didn't like. Signing Lowe didn't sit well with me at first, but the more I read the reasons for the contract, the more I could accept it. Kent isn't as bad a defensive second baseman as some would suggest. Choi is a good hitter, if someone would let him play every day.
What tips me against the firing, however, is that DePodesta was hired for five years. He was trying to win today, but my guess is he was more interested in winning tomorrow. Sometimes, you do need to take a step back. Paul wasn't going to make rash moves due to injuries; that wasn't the plan. He was willing to eat this season to be better in the future. He's not going to get the chance, and that's a shame.
If the Dodgers hire Gillick, I expect Pat to do very well. While Gillick paints himself as the anti-Moneyball GM, he's not. Gillick does with his head what DePodesta does with a computer. Look at the teams he created in Toronto and Seattle. His offenses were built around players with great OBAs. He knew when to replace high priced stars with cheaper ones who also had talent. His trade of Fernandez and McGriff for Alomar and Carter made the team younger and better, especially as he was able to move Olerud into the first base slot. It was a great Moneyball deal.
Gillick will win with the foundation laid by Evans and DePodesta, and we'll hear no end of how much better his style does.
Posted by David Pinto at
06:53 PM
|
Management
|
TrackBack (1)
That's one thing I'll definitely say in DePo's defense--- that he strengthened the farm system. Although I remember Joe Thurston and Edwin Jackson being highly touted a couple of years ago, and they've never panned out. A couple of fellows who came up this year looked promising, but when you see wizards like Zach Duke and Jeff Francouer come up for other teams, it's hard not to get jealous.
His firing is ridiculous. I believe that it's just another example of owners claiming to go in one direction, and then changing their mind half way through. If you're going to put your team in the hands of an ultra-smart statistician such as DePodesta, then go with it, but he didn't make any moves that were too too bad. It's unfortunate that McCourt couldn't see that winning takes time. A winning organizational plan takes more than two years. DePodesta was still working off of what Evans gave him, they never even gave the man the chance to make his long-term deals pan out. That's a shame.
I agree with Steve - DePo never had a chance to do what he was hired to do. I think its because of McCourt.
It seems that McCourt comes from the Jerry Jones/George Steinbrenner School Of Sports Ownership, which teaches that the Owner, in all of his ultimate power, must make all the decisions, General Manager be damned. If you hire a guy to do a job (for 5 years), then let him do the job.
McCourt is an idiot.
But, all that being said, as a lifelong Padre fan, my heart isn't exactly broken.
I'm a diehard Mets fan, and this has Fred Wilpon written all over it.
I estatic that the Dodger front office under the foolhardy ownership of tightwad McCourt is floundering. While the Dodgers have some talent they have let better talent leave. Names too numerous come to mind , Konerko, Deluca, etc.
As a lifelong Giants fan I love Blue implosions!
I'm estatic that the Dodger front office under the foolhardy ownership of tightwad McCourt is floundering. While the Dodgers have some talent they have let better talent leave. Names too numerous come to mind , Konerko, Deluca, etc.
As a lifelong Giants fan I love Blue implosions!
you guys keep talking about his moves.
the move he NEEDED to make that he didn't was to right quick learn how to be friends with a VERY hostile media from the get go.
and THAT'S what he got fired for, not derek lowe or paul loduca
Couple of things:
(a) When discussing DePo's good moves and bad moves, he should have traded Edwin Jackson when the guy's stock was high. If I recall correctly, he was offered good players, but Jackson was deemed untouchable. Who knows if an extra player or two would have made a difference in the '04 postseason.
(b) Gillick is anti-Moneyball, because even years ago, smart baseball people know the value of OBP and SLG, but I think what made him successful was the concept that you don't need a superstar to win. If you assemble very good players at all positions, you can win. The Mariners were solid in 2001, without A-Rod, Griffey, and RJ.
I heard on ESPN that the McCourts are trying to make themselves the brand name, with "Dodgers" as the product; as opposed to Dodgers as the brand name with baseball as the product. I wasn't listening too closely, but if this is so, then the Dodgers are in deep trouble.
Yeah, that thing about the McCourts being the brand name makes no sense at all. Who on earth goes to a ballgame to watch the owner?
Adam,
you mean besides the Yankees?
I'm a Yankees fan, and while George does bluster a lot to get the back page of the local rags, he does recognize that the product is winning baseball, and the brand name is Yankees.
Said Weisman: "Do you know what the Dodgers' record for consecutive postseason appearances is in their 121-year history? Two. It is a Dodger tradition, like it or not, to have disappointment and then regroup."
Say I: The Dodgers have gone to back-to-back postseasons four times, in fact: the 1952-53, 1955-56, 1965-66, and 1977-78 World Series. They won two of those Series (including one in Brooklyn).
And, for the record, I think DePodesta got the shiv not so much because of stuff like the Paul Lo Duca deal (I applauded it at the time and I still defend it: Lo Duca was a clubhouse leader but he was an on-the-field fadeaway in the second half for his entire career---you can have 25 brotherly love guys in the clubhouse, but so did the 1962 Mets) but because he made the mistake Theo Epstein didn't make. (Well, the second mistake: the first was working for McSorda LaCourt in the first place.) Moneyball with the human element factored in with the statistical primacy equaled the 2004 Red Sox; Moneyball without the human element factored in equaled the 2005 Dodgers. (And, allowing for the Dodgers' injury quotient, it only went from critical to nuclear when someone convinced DePodesta that Jeff Kent could come aboard with excellent stats and the personality of a mongoose to Milton Bradley's cobra . . . )
---Jeff
That Jasso guys comments wheren't far from home. Gotcha Rich