September 13, 2005
Fearing the Committee
Tony Massarotti fears the return of the closer by committee in the Boston bullpen.
But back to the seventh for a moment. Having operated with a structured bullpen for the large majority of his managerial career in Boston, Francona now seems to have zero confidence in virtually every Sox reliever but Timlin and, seemingly, Papelbon. The manager certainly has every right, particularly during a season in which Red Sox relievers have been swimming in gasoline.
No wonder the prices keep going up.
But the committee approach? No, no, no, no. It doesn't work. We all saw that during the early stages of the 2003 season, when the bullpen failed so miserably that the Sox went out and acquired Kim from the Arizona Diamondbacks for Shea Hillenbrand. Kim stablized the bullpen – at least during the majority of the regular season – the same way Curt Schilling did this year, which is another frightening similarity between this year and that one.
I don't agree that a committee can't work. In fact, Francona should be praised for using (in his opinion his best pitcher with the game on the line. That was the save right there. The "best" relief pitcher's job is to get outs in precisely that situation, not mow down the the bottom of the order in the ninth. The Red Sox just need to decide who the best is right now.
Posted by David Pinto at
09:15 AM
|
Pitchers
|
TrackBack (0)
I agree entirely. Just because the Sox tried something for half a season (if that) and it didn't work, doesn't mean the idea is flawed. Baseball research seems to be unable to show any kind of consistent "clutch" effect in hitters. Why do we insist then that it exists in certain pitchers? Not to mention, the Sox closer committee in 2003 was not exactly a Gordon/Rivera-type lineup.
Unless you have a lights-out closer--and honestly, there are only a few that qualify--there's no good reason to hold back using your best pitcher in that situation.
Let's say Timlin gets Wells out. It's a 5-2 game, Timlin pitches the 8th, then Papelbon pitches the 9th. It'd be one of those meaningless saves, where Timlin really did the difficult work.
Besides, I understand that Timlin himself has said he's more comfortable pitching in the 7th or 8th, though I think we're dealing with psychology here more than anything.
After watcing Papelbon pitch last night, I would say Francona should use him in the 9th for a little while and see how that works out. He looked quite good against the Blue Jays giving up no hits in 3 innings.
Agree that Francona should just use anybody who's gotten somebody out lately. The Sox rank last in the AL in bullpen ERA, and nobody's close to depriving them of the distinction. The next-to-last Rangers are almost a half-run better on bullpen ERA.
At this point you can't afford not to try everybody and anybody.
It was bad pitching, not bad strategy, that caused the 2003 approach to fail.
But I've long felt there was another force at work: the dreaded spectre of "conventional wisdom."
I don't think Grady Little bought into, or even fully understood, the concept. The same goes for the guys most responsible for making it work -- the pitchers in the Boston bullpen.
There's an argument to be made that pitchers are more comfortable in narrowly defined roles, and thus better able to prepare.
In Boston's case, you also had a skeptical manager and a dismissive, almost mocking press to deal with.
Just because it was a great idea didn't mean the Sox would be able to implement it. Theo needed buy-in, and he didn't have it.
He all but admitted defeat with the Foulke signing that winter.
In 1985 Whitey Herzog had a true bullpen by committee in St. Louis and it worked out great for him (101 wins, 6 different relievers with saves, six different relievers with more than 10 games finished). A bullpen by committee certainly works in theory, and unless baseball has changed significantly over the past 20 years, I don't see any reason it couldn't work in practice as well. Perhaps the key, as Walt suggests, is the right environment. Whitey was brilliant with his use of the pen, and the press in St. Louis endorsed his set-up, so there was none of the melodrama you had up in Boston a couple years ago.
My only complaint about last night is that Francona pulled Foulke for Timlin mid-inning. Shows an utter lack-of-confidence in Foulke, if you ask me. Yes, Foulke has pitched very poorly vs. RHB this season (which, I'm sure, is the reason Franky wanted Timlin in there), but those stats are affected by injury. His career BAA vs. RHB is better than Timlin's and since his return from the DL, he's been putting up #'s like his earlier years: 3.2 IP, 3H, 1BB, 4K (including last night).
While I generally agree with these comments, think that it is undeniable that much bullpen use is driven by the design of the save stat, and see no reason a "bullpen-by-committee" can't be quite effective, still -- I do think those of us on the sideline might underestimate how much it helps a pitcher to be able to anticipate the circumstances of his use (not to mention how much it helps a pitching coach get people up and down in the pen efficiently.) It often isn't making the most game value to use your closer only in 9th-inning save situations, but it may be the best way to get best reliever throwing his best when he does come in. I don't know.
Cabybara has a point. I think relievers and bullpen coaches want to know what the routine is. Take this year's Phillies. It's almost a given that you see Madson in the 7th, Urbina in the 8th, and Wagner in the 9th.
I agree that routine is nice...if your bullpen is producing. But if you've got a disaster like the Sox, it's hard to lock into a routine. After all, lots of hurlers have to be stinking it up to manufacture the worst bullpen ERA in the league, by a mile.
So some mixing and matching is unavoidable. If you finally find some guys who can do the job (like Papelbon, maybe) then you can start setting up a more consistent structure.
Except I think the Sox want Papelbon in the rotation. That's the way they mostly used him in the minors. Back to mixing and matching...