Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
February 01, 2005
Probabilistic Model of Range, Third Basemen

For your perusal, the 2004 third basemen.

Probabilistic Model of Range, Third Basemen, 2004, 1000 balls in play.
PlayerInPlayActual OutsPredicted OutsDERPredicted DERDifference
Pedro Feliz1096112 95.35 0.102 0.087 0.01519
Kevin Youkilis1556150 127.43 0.096 0.082 0.01450
Russell Branyan1117117 101.69 0.105 0.091 0.01371
Chone Figgins2031178 150.47 0.088 0.074 0.01356
Scott Rolen3671391 342.41 0.107 0.093 0.01324
Ryan Freel1253142 125.75 0.113 0.100 0.01297
Adrian Beltre3998416 364.53 0.104 0.091 0.01287
Chipper Jones2435224 193.35 0.092 0.079 0.01259
Eric Chavez3437357 324.13 0.104 0.094 0.00956
Joe Randa3343306 274.41 0.092 0.082 0.00945
Melvin Mora3697351 319.72 0.095 0.086 0.00846
Alex Rodriguez4213329 293.99 0.078 0.070 0.00831
Bill Mueller2448216 196.31 0.088 0.080 0.00805
Mike Lamb1366135 124.49 0.099 0.091 0.00770
David A Wright1870158 145.59 0.084 0.078 0.00663
Corey Koskie3031262 242.37 0.086 0.080 0.00648
Vinny Castilla4121405 379.12 0.098 0.092 0.00628
Casey Blake4116369 343.77 0.090 0.084 0.00613
Todd Zeile1107103 96.33 0.093 0.087 0.00602
David Bell3805377 355.71 0.099 0.093 0.00559
Juan Castro1224101 94.90 0.083 0.078 0.00499
Rob Mackowiak1289117 111.23 0.091 0.086 0.00448
Sean Burroughs3286279 264.57 0.085 0.081 0.00439
Edgardo Alfonzo3326307 292.39 0.092 0.088 0.00439
Mark DeRosa1748138 130.35 0.079 0.075 0.00438
Chad A Tracy3136320 307.39 0.102 0.098 0.00402
Ty Wigginton2875256 244.78 0.089 0.085 0.00390
Hank Blalock4358362 345.35 0.083 0.079 0.00382
Mike Lowell3921357 342.36 0.091 0.087 0.00373
Morgan Ensberg2564222 213.08 0.087 0.083 0.00348
Scott Spiezio1787170 163.79 0.095 0.092 0.00347
Geoff Blum1233105 100.79 0.085 0.082 0.00342
Aramis Ramirez3464291 284.46 0.084 0.082 0.00189
Tony Batista4042367 364.15 0.091 0.090 0.00071
Aubrey Huff2214182 181.20 0.082 0.082 0.00036
Brandon Inge1690162 161.45 0.096 0.096 0.00033
Chris Stynes1187106 105.75 0.089 0.089 0.00021
Eric Munson2298208 207.88 0.091 0.090 0.00005
Joe Crede3800299 303.50 0.079 0.080 -0.00118
Keith Ginter1152103 104.47 0.089 0.091 -0.00128
Eric Hinske4121321 333.49 0.078 0.081 -0.00303
Desi Relaford103694 98.16 0.091 0.095 -0.00402
Wes Helms1696141 152.49 0.083 0.090 -0.00677
Mike Cuddyer105776 86.95 0.072 0.082 -0.01036

The Greek God of Walks might also be "death to flying things" at third base. Kevin Youkilis did a great job filling in at third base for the Red Sox this season. I'm not surprised to see Scott Rolen as the top everyday third baseman, but I am surprised to see Chipper Jones rate that highly. And A-Rod aquitted himself well in the move to a new position.

Overall, you'll notice that the third basmen are as positive as the shortstops are negative. I wonder if shifts have become so prevalent that third basemen are picking up a lot of balls that shortstops usually field. I've certainly scored games this season where the third baseman caught the ball at the bag at 2nd base. If the shift was being use a lot more than in 2002 and 2003, that might account for us seeing third basemen positive and shortstops negative.


Posted by David Pinto at 07:25 PM | Defense | TrackBack (2)
Comments

It's probably premature to ask, but I'll do so anyway: do you have any idea how PMR might help us understand how a player will fare upon switching positions? You mention A-Rod, but can we figure out yet to what extent he's either the exception or the rule?

Posted by: Robert Tagorda at February 1, 2005 09:33 PM

Any chance of a breakdown on those Euclis numbers? I don't think any of the season ticket holders in Pawtucket would accept that at face value.

Posted by: Danil at February 1, 2005 09:45 PM

It was the Year of the Third Baseman on offense, so why not on defense too?

Posted by: SirKayGee at February 1, 2005 10:03 PM

If 80% of 3rd basemen are "above average" and 80% of Short Stops are "below average", then maybe the average is off. Seems an obvious wrinkle to examine in your model.

Posted by: killabmc at February 2, 2005 10:16 AM

Let's remember one thing: catching a foul ball for an out is less valuable than catching a fair ball. A dropped or missed foul ball simply means the batter gets another chance to hit, with around a 65-70% chance of making an out some other way. The consequences of a dropped or missed ball in fair territory are much greater, as the batter will almost certainly reach base.

Posted by: Matt Davis at February 2, 2005 10:18 AM

Its any easy step to add +X to SS and subtract X from 3B. What's important is how the players compare to each other.

Melvin Mora's rating surprises me.

Posted by: rallymonkey at February 2, 2005 10:53 AM

Range factors in the National League were in line with past two years' data. If fielders were taking more balls from shortstops, wouldn't that be reflected in RF?

Posted by: rich a at February 2, 2005 11:10 AM

Matt,

I'm not so sure that's a realistic way to look at things. All you're doing is comparing what you can expect if you succeed with what could potentially happen if you fail in the most dismal way possible (i.e. an out vs. a runner reaching base...possibly even a run scoring).

Something to keep in mind is that the vast majority of foul outs are pop-ups. The ones that do land in "catchable" territory are generally, well, "catchable."

What might be a better way to look at it would be to get the usual probability that a "catchable" foul out is turned into an out, use that to determine the total benefit given to a team for making those outs, then compare that to the detriment caused to a team by all the "catchable" outs *not* turned into outs (this would include balls that simply "fell," balls that were turned into live balls and thus allowed a runner to get on base, balls that allowed runners to advance, etc.). This analysis would basically turn into a "runs prevented vs. runs allowed," argument (most accurately done via derivatives).

Granted, catching a foul ball is *probably* less valuable than turning a foul ball into a live ball (I say probably because everything is context sensitive), I wouldn't hesitate to bet that over the total course of a season, and indeed for the majority of situations in a game, going after the foul ball is worth more to a team than simply ignoring them.

Posted by: Inquisitor at February 2, 2005 05:42 PM

Chipper only had to play a little over half the season at 3B. That's got to be the only explanation for his good play last year.

I find it hard to believe that he's suddenly become above-average at 32-33, especially after two years in the OF.

I think he'll be back to his normal self this year, and by June, most of us will wonder why in the heck he's blocking a top hitting prospect who also happens to be excellent defensively...

Posted by: mchenrmd at February 2, 2005 06:16 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?