March 02, 2004
Naming Names
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that Sheffied, Bonds, Giambi, Santiago, Marvin Benard and Randy Velarde all received steroids.
The baseball stars allegedly got the illegal performance-enhancing drugs from the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative through Greg Anderson, Bonds' personal weight trainer and longtime friend, according to information furnished the government and shared with The Chronicle.
The Chronicle is very quiet about the source. The informant doesn't know if these players actually used the substances:
The information shared with The Chronicle did not explicitly state that the athletes had used the drugs they were said to have obtained. Bonds, who is baseball's single-season home-run king, and Giambi, who won the American League Most Valuable Player award when he was with the Oakland Athletics, have publicly denied using steroids. So has Sheffield. All three declined to discuss the matter Monday.
The biggest charge in article is that Bonds used Human Growth Hormone during the 2001 season, the year he broke the HR record. The players continue to deny using these drugs.
Update: In the comments, John Gibson asks:
Why the distinction between obtaining and using? Would anyone on this planet actually believe they obtained steroids but chose not to use them?
I think the distintiction comes in using the word "obtained" vs. "received." The way it's being portrayed in the media, I get the impression that the trainer gave these substances to the players, as opposed to the players asking for them. Sort of, here try this, it will make you stronger. Maybe the players took the drugs and didn't use them. Or maybe they were told the drugs were not illegal. I know it's farfetched, but it's something to consider.
Now I could believe that BALCO used the pitch, "This is new, it's not a steroid so it's legal." If so, the ballplayers would be no more gullible than the people who buy the herbal supplements I see in my e-mail spam all the time.
All-in-all, I'd like to hear these allegations from a named source.
Update: Off Wing Opinion picks up on something I missed. And through that link, Stick and Move finds the humor in Velarde using steroids. I guess you have to be good in the first place for these drugs to earn you a lot of money.
Posted by David Pinto at
07:49 AM
|
Cheating
|
TrackBack (2)
Why the distinction between obtaining and using? Would anyone on this planet actually believe they obtained steroids but chose not to use them?
I wonder if this proves out if the teams have any financial recourse as it would mean several of these players got huge 10+ million a year salaries based on steroid enhanced production.
I was wondering about that - could BALCO have passed it to the players as a superior supplement without them knowing it was steroids. I mean, the players would no doubt notice that BALCO's supplements were very effective possibly without knowing why.
I want to believe the above but I also seriously doubt it. As a Yankees fan I've seen enough of Giambi to doubt it. But lets say Bonds, Giambi, and Sheffield are guilty of knowingly taking steroids. Now lets say that Bonds, Giambi, and Sheffield are guilty of taking the steroids unknowingly. How do we know one from the other? Does it matter when/if punishment gets delivered?
I think a steroids stink like this was inevitable. But Randy Velarde? Are you kidding me?
Why on earth would teams have "financial recourse" due to steroid use, if the player in fact delivered the production that was expected of him? Do you really think that the owners gave a damn where the player's performance came from, as long as he kept it up?
I'm glad that Velarde and Benard were named - for every superstar like Bonds who gets the media spotlight, there are probably 10 or 15 players like Velarde who are the real steroid and HGH demand-drivers. I don't blame them - the level of competition at the major-league level is ferocious, and there are enormous financial incentives to maximize performance and decrease time lost to injury and recovery.
What annoys me is the hysteria and largely politcally-driven frenzy of this particular crusade. By defining all of these supplements as illegal and enforcing a draconian ban, the government is in fact ensuring that a thriving, extremely profitable black market in those supplements will continue to exist. Regulation and restriction are far more effective tactics for high-demand substances, but to push for that would mean admitting that the entire War on Drugs is in fact a failure, and no Administration would be willing to do that.
I think we are witnessing the opening chapter of a very ugly period for MLB. Selig has the chance to actually do something right and redeem his tenure, I'm sure he won't handle this correctly and this is going to get bad.
I've never liked Barry Bonds but it's too bad for him now -- his career is forever tarnished.
We are quickly approaching the point where it’s time to say enough to the apologists.
To me, it doesn’t matter if Bonds or Giambi or Sheffield knowingly took steroids. These guys are athletes who make their living off of their bodies. Only a complete moron would put something in their body and be completely ignorant of what it was. Bonds has carved out a space of plausible deniability, as he has reportedly claimed to have taken substances from un-marked containers. Enough already! It is the athlete’s responsibility to know what’ in their system. Period. The buck stops with them.
The problem his that MLB has yet to adopt a zero tolerance stance against this stuff. If that day comes along, you can believe that players won’t be taking substances from unmarked containers.
Let's keep two things in mind: First, baseball cannot simply enforce a "zero tolerance" policy on steroid use. The labor laws give the MLBPA monopoly bargaining power, and so long as that's the case, the union can exercise a de facto veto over any tightening of the drug testing policy.
Second, the BALCO case is not about law enforcement, but rather carrying out a political agenda set by the attorney general and the White House. Remember, every federal resource that goes into this case is a resource not being used to carry out the Justice Department's primary mission--protecing Americans from violent crime.
YES! Lets blame this whole thing on John Ashcroft!
Dave you can take your head out of the sand and come up for air any time now...
I believe that you are correct concerning the importance of the word selection. Certainly these atheletes will choose the softer words when they are finally forced to admit to using illegal substances (steriods). Seriously, look at Giambi and Bonds and ask yourself did they use steriods? We all know the answer, MLB knows the answer too. Steriods are rampid in professional sports! How many teams do you think would have been caught in the NFL if the search would have went farther then the Raider locker room? Why do we care if the atheletes use steriods? Its good for the sports; more home runs, harder hits, faster players. Don't hate me for telling the truth. Anyway, could using steriods be any worse for you than being a professional boxer? I doubt it.
Wait a minute. If we can let a president get away with "I didn't inhale" and "depends on the meaning of 'is'", what's the big deal with saying a few ballplayers "ontained" but never "used"? :-P
The proof will be in the pudding. Or the blood test.
Apparently, we as a nation are more forgiving of the most powerful man on the planet than we are of athletes who entertain us.
The 'dumbing down' of America is quickly reaching its Zenith. Or Nadir. Your choice.
I have a real concern about my son's junior college. Three of the players are using something they are calling "orange juice". What is it? They are HUGE and are hitting the ball 600 feet. The other players are real upset but are afraid to discuss with the coach. Does anyone know what this could be? Oh their eyes are real dialated.